data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1594/d15946b3bb1602d73b9355fc63736930373cdccf" alt=""
Assets Seized by U.S. Marshals
The United States Marshals Service plays a substantial role in identifying and evaluating assets forfeited by the Department of Justice. The U.S. Marshals manage and dispose of most of the property seized for forfeiture. The United States Marshals Service is the primary custodian of seized property. The types of property subject to civil asset forfeiture proceedings might include cash, financial instruments, real estate, commercial businesses, vehicles, jewelry, art, antiques, collectibles, vessels, and aircraft.
In 2020, the Asset Forfeiture Division of the United States Marshals Service estimated the value of its seized assets at that time at $2.78 billion. In addition to the U.S. Marshals Service, other major participants include DOJ, ATF, DEA, FBI, U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, and USPS.
Attorney Sebastian Rucci focuses his law practice on Seizures and Asset Forfeitures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d969/5d96932d65dadb902299b33fa52484070d5005d4" alt=""
Forfeiture attorney Sebastian Rucci is available as co-counsel, working with other counsel, where he focuses on challenging the asset forfeiture and seizure aspect of the case throughout the United States. Forfeiture attorney Sebastian Rucci often takes civil asset forfeiture cases on a contingency fee basis, which means that you pay nothing until the money or other asset is returned. Let experienced forfeiture attorney Sebastian Rucci put his experience with federal seizures and forfeiture actions to work for you, call attorney Sebastian Rucci at 330-720-0398.
Forfeiture attorney Sebastian Rucci can show that the seized assets are not the proceeds of criminal activity and that the agency did not have probable cause to seize the funds or other assets. Even if a showing of probable cause has been made, he can file to rebut the probable cause by demonstrating that the forfeiture statute was not violated, that the agency failed to trace the funds, or showing an affirmative defense that entitles the immediate return of the seized assets.